I found this excellent quote by someone called Esmée Chengapen over at opensourcetheology.net
"If we view poor people as not having enough to eat, a place to sleep, the unspoken assumption is to provide the missing things and the poor will no longer be poor. If they do not have the relevant skills or knowledge, then providing education and if the poor simply learns enough, they will no longer be poor. We, as followers of Christ, then add the knowledge of the gospel to our programme for the poor.
This has been the traditional approach of the church, however it creates a “Santa Claus” picture of the communities of faith and the poor become passive recipients of the church’s generosity. This approach has two negative consequences: it demeans the poor and it temps us to play god in the lives of the poor."
This is the danger we face whenever we 'do mission' without first understanding the community we want to work in. All to often we impose our thoughts of what the community is need of upon a group of people, instead of talking to people to find out what their needs are. The biggest reason for this is that we often don't live in the communities that we are trying to help, and instead of understanding the situations have become somewhat philanthropic in our attitudes towards them.
Over on Gordon's blog there is a quote from Catherine Booth where she calls us to be a "living embodiment of Christianity .... if The Salvation Army is not going to be that, may God put it out!". Gordon goes on to say, "I'm worried because if that embodiment has been allowed to become humanitarianism, that embodiment is partial and represents the 'sham compassion' that Catherine was so vehement about in her age of philanthropy."
I suspect that we have already crossed over this line and are guilty of the 'Santa Claus' mentality. Consequently, this may well be one of the 'sins of the camp' of which we need to repent. If we're not prepared to then maybe God is already in the process of 'putting us out'!